Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Hall-Smith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. NAC— S Marshall  Talk / Cont  23:47, 24 August 2009 (UTC)'''

Vanessa Hall-Smith

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Probably a non-notable person, through the article has an unreliable source and it doesn't apply WP:BIO. ApprenticeFan talk  contribs 09:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I share the notability concern however there are plenty of RS attesting to her age and past employment (as a lawyer to music industry she appeared in professional and, rarely, mainstream press). NVO (talk) 10:49, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Just in case I notified her through the Institute site, maybe she decides to take the article down. NVO (talk) 16:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Though some of the sources are on the week side, one from the Times is certainly significant, and in-depth. Quantpole (talk) 11:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per Quantpole, timesonline is certainly a reliable source, and I notice that this article is also sourced to the Independent, another British quality paper that would certainly count as a reliable source for Wikipedia's purposes.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  12:07, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn timesonline is actually a reliable source, though it is verifiable. ApprenticeFan  talk  contribs 12:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.