Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Perron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus  - not deleting per the source found at the end, but without prejudice towards a future nomination --B (talk) 14:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Vanessa Perron

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod removed without comment. I can find some name drops on this person, but nowhere near the substantial independent sourcing that would support a full biography. Does not appear to be notable. Seraphimblade Talk to me 04:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete No awards, but she did make the cover of the March 2005 Spanish edition of Elle, Canada edition and Quebec edition. --06:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient ntoability to meet inclusion guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep "cover of the March 2005 Spanish edition of Elle, Canada edition and Quebec edition." Making the cover of coveted fashion magazines in its respective countries clearly meets "depth of coverage", also found via googletubes something in Marie Claire. Had she been in the American and British edition of Elle, I am sure you guys would have voted for keep... WP:BIAS. Also Fashion TV covered her  Thanks!--Cerejota (talk) 09:24, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no bias here, as I would readily argue to delete under the circumstances you state. Being on a magazine cover does not make one notable, nor does being on a Youtube video. Having multiple, substantial, reliable sources written about a subject makes it notable. In the absence of those, the subject is not notable. These sources are, in one case, not substantial, and in the other not particularly in-depth. A full biography of a person requires a lot more. Seraphimblade Talk to me 02:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: Fails WP:BIO. Schuym1 (talk) 19:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep – I found one article about her in The San Diego Union-Tribune, which I added just now. It gives me some hope that there is more coverage out there, if a non-Canadian newspaper has reported about her. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   — Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.