Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Spencer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Vanessa Spencer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actress. Musa Talk ☻ 07:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 12:32, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, she doesn't have enough credits currently to be seen as notable - one in a short film and the other appears to be a small part. Two of the references don't mention this actress.  A new article can be created when she has more of a portfolio.  PK  T (alk)  15:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Every actor or actress in existence does not automatically get a Wikipedia article just because they exist — but there's neither enough substance, nor enough reliable sourcing, here to give her a WP:NACTOR pass for anything. While I can't prove anything, I'm getting a distinct whiff of conflict of interest to boot — there's entirely too much completely unsourced and unsourceable detail about her personal life for this to be anything other than at least a partial WP:AUTOBIO. A person's mother's maiden name, for instance, is not an easy detail to find out if the media haven't reported it already, unless you have a direct relationship of some kind with that person. Bearcat (talk) 08:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Certainly questionable for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister   talk  23:34, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.