Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Vicera


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Vanessa Vicera
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

An earnest but ultimately non-notable person, ghits dont seem to show any achievements since 2004 plus all the text, which hasn't been updated since last November is a clear CopyVio from www.acs-england.co.uk/student_life/peaceprize/winner_04.htm. Was speedied and then tags removed MNewnham (talk) 04:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This article has a long way to go, but it has potential and the person is notable in that she has started a project and is a philanthropist. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet notability guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, commendable what she has done, not notable. I could only find trivial mentions on Gnews and in local news. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete We're not here to fluff a commendable college student's resume. Award is great; good for subject. Hope she proves me wrong some day. Would like to hear from page creator, whose only two edits are to this page. BusterD (talk) 13:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.