Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanessa Yanow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:56, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Vanessa Yanow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article on a Canadian painter. I came across it while working on Canadian Artist stubs. Article has not had any real work for years. Ref search comes up with a couple newspaper sources, but nothing recent and nothing close to significant coverage. Does not seem to meet WP:GNG New Media Theorist (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. New Media Theorist (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC) New Media Theorist (talk) 18:20, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as my searches simply found nothing better than this and there isn't even minimal coverage to improve. SwisterTwister   talk  06:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 00:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – Does not meet WP:BASIC or WP:ARTIST, verified after several source searches. North America1000 08:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:ARTIST. Not notable. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs ) ~ 21:47, 28 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.