Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanguard (2011 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Icewedge (talk) 21:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Vanguard (2011 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

No assertion of notability whatsoever. It's a high school project which, holy smokes has been covered in blogs!!!!!111. Ironholds (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Decently done up to look like a regular film article, but at its heart this is WP:SPAM, with a bit of WP:CRYSTAL as well. --RL0919 (talk) 21:08, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It will be a film made by students, thus unlikely to be notable. Armbrust (talk) 21:15, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Even if the film was a notable project, it clearly fails the criterion that it actually has to have started principle filming before the article is written. Clear case of WP:CRYSTAL. - Mgm|(talk) 13:21, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - complete lack of independent reliable sources sufficient to establish notability for this vanity article. MikeWazowski (talk) 04:33, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD A7 Delete as WP:NN. > RUL3R >trolling >vandalism  03:40, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:N. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:35, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - as a project by high school students, this doesn't immediately scream "this is notable." Lack of independent, significant, reliable coverage only confirms that this (at least at this present moment) is not notable according to our notability guidelines, and therefore is unfit for inclusion at this time.  Additionally, WP:CRYSTAL seems to apply here (2011 is a ways away!).  Cocytus   [»talk«]  16:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.