Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanishing spray


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep, obvious disruptive nomination. --MuZemike 17:44, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Vanishing spray

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unimportant. This article brings no importance whatsoever to Wikipedia. VivaLVEnvy (talk) 17:06, 29 July 2012 (UTC) — VivaLVEnvy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep Mentioned by several RS, in use by two top division leagues and being considered by others.  Fasttimes68 (talk) 17:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sources in the article are reliable and establish notability. As for importance, this seems like a perfectly valid example of a sports technology to me (although the article could stand expansion in the area of how it works chemically). -- BenTels (talk) 17:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep : The article seems notable and has reliable sources. The nominator's argument sounds like a textbook case of WP:WEDONTNEEDIT -- Ritchie333  (talk)  17:39, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.