Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanity (clothing)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 22:07, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Vanity (clothing)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I am not sure about the notability. Was afraid to CSD.  Lourie Pieterse  19:15, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems a bit promotional in tone but 200 stores in 27 states (assuming that unsourced information is accurate) seems to give it roughly similar notability to many other businesses we have articles about. I just did a casual check on the stores in my local mall and all of them seem to have articles similar to this, so I think notability for retail chains of this size has established consensus. Ben Kidwell (talk) 19:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * keep. meets wp:corp and isnt terribly advert-y. Mystache (talk) 22:15, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup; significant-sized chain with non-trivial history and I'm sure there're sources somewhere. Most of the retail articles suck because nobody can be bothered to add any freaking sources. I did find one but otherwise I'm having a hard time making Google understand. Can someone with better Google-fu PLEASE help? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 16:27, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi TenPoundHammer. I've Googled for the words Vanity, Inc. This way one gets the most accurate results. Kind regards,  Lourie Pieterse  12:14, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.