Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanlocator


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:08, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Vanlocator

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non Notable magazine Codf1977 (talk) 10:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

If you run the same sources with this page Professional_Van_and_Light_Truck_Magazine similar results are returned. It doesn't seem consistent? CommercialVehicleExpert (talk) 11:50, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - unfortunately consistency isn't really a powerful argument here since the discussion is focussed on this article, not other ones out of the 86 billion or however many there now are. You might want to have a look at places like Deletion policy, Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions and especially Other stuff exists where this is discussed, er, at length! Hope this helps, best wishes DBaK (talk) 12:11, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this magazine. Joe Chill (talk) 13:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, no sources to be found on google news. -- Nuujinn (talk) 16:03, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.