Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanshika Verma Khare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Vanshika Verma Khare

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non-notable person, the sources are all utterly unreliable despite coming from big names - they're just rehashed press releases. The Statesman, for example has an inspiration hub which publishes PR crap that people pay for, same with Hans India and the rest. And lest we not forget, the stellar reporting of "DD News" who proudly proclaim "Women literally go to places in life!" as if it's some sort of surprise. CUPIDICAE💕 15:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Strong delete Fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 17:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, excluding pr-fluff. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 17:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep The subject is notable having three published books and sufficient WP:RS. Capankajsmilyo (talk) 04:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * can you please provide a source that isn't a rehashed press release or brand promotion? Because right now there are 0. CUPIDICAE💕  13:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

As the article creator you are usually expected to ivote keep. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 11:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * It is ok if page creator wants to vote, assuming they have accounted for the concerns being raised. Vikram Vincent 08:12, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nom.Ruqayya ansari (talk) 10:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as the subject is not notable and sources are not exactly reliable per WP:RS. Vikram Vincent 08:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.