Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanya Yudin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 09:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Vanya Yudin

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I doubt its notability --The Firewall 18:02, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Keep Passes WP:V (I've even added 3 more sources myself to the article). Due to the coverage and the rarity of the idea, I'd say that it passes notability guidelines.--Pmedema (talk) 18:53, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:03, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: I've just fixed a cut and paste move involving this page and Bird boy.  Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  23:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT and WP:BLP or possible merge with Feral child without naming the subject. Do we want this unfortunate boy to live the rest of his life with this article defining him as a person? Phil Bridger (talk) 17:06, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I can see where you are coming from but It seems to be more an event larger then the individual as this is something that we read about tantamount to "The Jungle Book"... Moving on from that opinion, I can also see where your coming from regarding the name.  The convention used for Rochom P'ngieng was to forward it to the nick name which is Cambodian jungle girl.  The original of this article was the nick name... maybe we should consider moving it back to the nick name and having a redirect for Vanya Yudin...  --Pmedema (talk) 18:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - The subject appears to have brief notability only in reference to being mistreated. This seems to fall under BLP1E and should be delete in preference of privacy and dignity in treatment of the subject.  Alternately if the incident received enough coverage itself, move it to the incident name and avoid using the child's name.  Shell    babelfish 00:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete--because I don't even believe in this hoax. The article right now has five sources, but they're all the same, basically: it's just the same 'news' published in different tabloids. But besides that, it's a tiny little news item that has no place in an encyclopedia. Drmies (talk) 00:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.