Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vapor-Liquid-Solid method


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   snowball keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:42, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Vapor-Liquid-Solid method

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NOT a cookbook; no references. KurtRaschke (talk) 03:33, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Drmies (talk) 03:50, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Not a recipe; actually, a very significant scientific process for which there are many references from which it can be expanded. See here and here for example. Also see here and here. Smile a While (talk) 04:04, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets notability and verifiability requirements for inclusion, as Smile a While has shown. Lots of room for expansion. THEN WHO WAS PHONE? (talk) 08:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - notability demonstrated - subtopic has article in print encyclopaedia - Wily D 10:43, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:22, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets notability standards. Elucidate (parlez à moi) Ici pour humor 22:16, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This article is not a recipe, any more than Painting is. No reason to delete. Fg2 (talk) 01:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per improvements to the article and the references that have been added. Nsk92 (talk) 01:48, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep but rename to Vapor-liquid-solid method (or process, or whatever). Liquid and solid are not proper nouns. --Itub (talk) 11:53, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.