Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varhaug Idrettslag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  Sandstein  05:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Amended: The result was   keep.   Sandstein   19:14, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Varhaug Idrettslag

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Procedural nomination per consensus at Deletion review/Log/2010 May 14, which was to overturn and list at AFD. No opinion as far as deletion/retention is concerned. –MuZemike 02:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and add the sources found at DRV. This sports club contains a football team that has played at their second tier and competed in the Norwegian cup. Bridgeplayer (talk) 03:12, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No attempt made to demonstrate notability. "Sources found" - I don't see any in the article. &mdash; RHaworth 06:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - The general rule of thumb (yes, I know it's not a guideline) is that any football club who has played in their national cup is generally notable. At the DRV, it was found that this club has played at least twice since 1980 (1982 and 1997). Searching for ""Varhaug IL" -wikipedia" brings up a few results, such as this story about their board, so it looks like there are sources to be found, although they'll take some rooting out.  Bettia  (talk)  11:00, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.  Bettia  (talk)  11:01, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions.  —Rettetast (talk) 11:40, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - per WP:FOOTYN. While not a guideline, it is definitely relavent here. IMO, competing in the norwegian cup and having played in the second division are sufficient achievements to merrit keeping the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 18:51, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable enough to deserve an article. GiantSnowman 21:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.