Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Variance map


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Variance map

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Neologism. No evidence that anybody uses this term. &mdash; RHaworth 00:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, or possibly made up graphing method.--Pontificalibus (talk) 10:47, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 15:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)


 * 'Delete No sources provided to back notability or clarify meaning or context. Melcombe (talk) 11:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Comments' When you say "no one" is using this term, what community are you considering? Is it strictly academia or does it include business practitioners? If your sample is inclusinve of the latter, it certainly is being used presently.
 * No one has said "no one". "No evidence that anybody uses this term" means primarily that the article doesn't have evidence (citations, sources) that anyone uses the term. If anyone has used the term, then quickly add some sources (showing this usage) to the article. Melcombe (talk) 11:10, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete The term is widely used ; but to mean something quite different from the topic of this article. -- 202.124.73.162 (talk) 12:38, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.