Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varjojenkirja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:35, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Varjojenkirja

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only references are primary or a link to a Google search, which does not appear to include any reliable sources.

References 1-3,4-12 are primary, 4 is a Google search that turns up little in the way of WP:RS, and 13 is a cryptic "Online interview of the administrators, 2008," which leads me to believe that that latter source could be WP:OR.

Based on this, this website does not satisfy WP:NWEB. TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:11, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:35, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:35, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


 * delete All the sources are primary, and I can't find anything that gives in depth coverage that isn't. For a site like this, it needs to be notable in someway to have an article, but it isn't. Also, why is this in english? Wouldn't it make more sense for the admins of the site to promote their article in their own language? What kind of cross international promotion is this? 💵Money emoji💵Talk 19:16, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * delete References are not independant of the subject. Needs better RS. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:55, 20 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.