Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varkon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 00:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Varkon

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Contested speedy delete Anthony Appleyard 15:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Varkon has been deleted twice:
 * At 10:36, 24 October 2007 by User:Anthony Appleyard
 * At 15:13, 14 April 2007 by User:Soumyasch
 * See Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Anthony Appleyard 15:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete based on my speedy nom and comments on WP:COIN. Notability cannot be asserted in accordance with WP:N. The article is based entirely on primary sources and was solicitated by the software developers per my evidence at WP:COIN. Add to this that it had already been deleted once and there is a clear cut candidate for deletion. EconomicsGuy 15:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. No independent sources to establish notability.  Cap'n Walker 15:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as this searching for this name on google returns 22,000 hits. Law &amp; Disorder 17:55, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm waiting for independent third-party sources describing actual usage of Varkon and indicating it is valuable. The recreation of a deleted article without going through DRV, and the creator's apparent COI, are troubling issues. The intemperate remarks of User:VeganEater, the person who re-created the article today, don't suggest good faith or respect for our policies.  EdJohnston 21:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete posthaste. Zero sources. shoy  16:02, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.