Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasaeleth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 20:32, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Vasaeleth

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. The article contains a weak assertion of importance, barely enough to pass speedy A7. However, the article is sourced only from unreliable sources and primary sources, and I was unable to find anything better. Delete.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 13:33, 27 August 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:RS. 2 says you, says two 13:36, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BAND. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources such as About.com, Blabbermouth.net and PopMatters are all reliable, and independent of the subject. See also Decibel and thelefthandpath.com.--  C  anniba loki  14:05, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * On every page of About.com: "Be the first to write a review:" 'Nuff said. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 14:09, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * This "Be the first to write a review" link is used to create an account on the site, becoming a member to "Share your opinions" and "Interact with other About.com users". Please consider reading the profile of Justin M. Norton, the music critic in question.--  C  anniba loki  14:25, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The coverage at PopMatters, Decibel, and About.com looks fine to me, although the Blabbermouth.net one looks like it's basically a reprint of a press release. Coverage is only just demonstrating notability, but that's just enough.--Michig (talk) 19:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.