Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasant Chauhan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Discounting the IP !votes, there is clear consensus for delete. Nakon 04:54, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Vasant Chauhan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The sources given in the article are mostly non-independent sources. The only reliable coverage in the article of use, and indeed the only significant coverage I could find was this, but given the scant coverage elsewhere I don't think he passes our notability guidelines. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:57, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguinHangout 14:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Cutest</b><b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b>Hangout 14:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — <b style="color:#D60047">C</b><b style="color:#F0A000">ute</b><b style="color:#00A300">st</b><b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b>Hangout 14:31, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The sources given in the article are genuine and he is eligible to wikipedia. I am full support Indian Video Blogger Vasant Chauhan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.43.251.23 (talk) 16:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep in addition to the sources Winner provided, He appears to be notable Check This — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.43.251.23 (talk) 17:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)  — 103.43.251.23 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. Fails general notability guidelines. Most of the references are either from self-published or primary sources, which is not considered to be the reliable source. Note: Website hits, Google Search density or YouTube views cannot be used to establish notability. There is need of significance coverage (in depth) in reliable sources to establish notability. — <b style="color:#D60047">C</b><b style="color:#F0A000">ute</b><b style="color:#00A300">st</b><b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b>Hangout 17:09, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep i am in support of Vasant Chauhan because of he is future. http://www.quora.com/Who-is-Vasant-Chauhan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 43.252.60.96 (talk) 07:30, 5 August 2015 (UTC)  — 43.252.60.96 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Quora.com is not a reliable source, see the article Identifying reliable sources.— <b style="color:#D60047">C</b><b style="color:#F0A000">ute</b><b style="color:#00A300">st</b><b style="color:#0A47FF">Penguin</b>Hangout 16:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete the only decent coverage is in the itimes piece, and that's such a poorly-written blog that it doesn't really meet WP:RS. YouTube hits show popularity, not notability. Primefac (talk) 10:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Almost no coverage in news. Author is SPA. Claim to notability that Lalit Modi shares his videos doesnt seem to be valid for WP:N ChunnuBhai (talk) 19:23, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete no claim of notability in the article, no coverage anywhere, web searchews turn up youtube videos and social media Kraxler (talk) 17:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.