Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasile Mihalca de Dolha and Petrova (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:40, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Vasile Mihalca de Dolha and Petrova
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The first AfD was a dud; let's hope this one is more conclusive. I have no particular comments to add from what I said there, except that neither of the two "sources" added in the interim demonstrate notability, either. One of them is a blog post, and isn't citable for anything. Another deals with the family of the subject's wife in the years 1749-1769, which has no bearing on the subject's notability, given that a) he came from another family and b) he married in 1924, over a century and a half after the period discussed in the book being cited. - Biruitorul Talk 13:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Elgatodegato (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:BIO, although if the sources (which are in Romanian) are bad, then it definitely fails. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - almost no sources (Romanian included) —Мандичка YO 😜 20:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.