Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vasiliu Lucilius


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was WP:SNOW delete. 1ne 06:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Vasiliu Lucilius

 * del. nonverifiable. Hoax or cookery. The Riemann hypothesis is so immensely known in math world that published attempts of proof are discussed. `'mikkanarxi 01:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - creator of the article claims that he is the creator of the image located in the article, leading me to believe this is a vanity article created by the subject of the article or someone who knows him. --- RockMFR 01:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete appears to be a hoax, and if it isn't, vanity/unverifiable/non-notable. The only hit lists him (or someone else with his name) as a graduate of some university.  Ultra-Loser  Talk / Contributions 01:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  Absolutely no verification of his claims to fame. Google, Yahoo, Live, and Ask all return exactly zero hits with regards to him or his work. Certainly, if he has actually been the originator of one of the "Breakthroughs in Superior Mathematics", he'd be of note and actually have something to back up his claims of mathematical genius. Delete, unless information can be found verifying his claims. –-  kungming· 2 | (Talk ·Contact) 01:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable, hoax.-- John Lake 01:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obvious hoax. Whoever proves the Riemann hypothesis gets a million dollars, so it would have been heard of. I think that the math in the article is just babbling, too. -Amarkov blahedits 01:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: no doubt a hoax. Biruitorul 01:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete patent nonsense --Steve (Slf67)talk 01:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - 3 ghits. MER-C 02:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. --SonicChao 05:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, why are we waiting? -- Jmabel | Talk 05:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hoax with no references and sources to verify claims. (aeropagitica) 05:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. As hoax and nonsense.  Spinach Dip 08:43, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, blatant hoax and nonsense. --Ter e nce Ong (C 10:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Hoaxful vanity page. Anyone who did what this page claims would be in every major news outlet in the world including home page of WP, and we'd be writing about him. Baccyak4H 17:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per all.-- Seadog 19:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete DEFINITELY a hoax. Hut 8.5 19:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Vanity Hoax.SkierRMH 03:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.