Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaso'd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete Xavexgoem (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Vaso'd
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * 1) Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This is an unnotable Neoglism DFS454 (talk) 20:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)#
 * 2) Agreed. DefenseSupportParty (talk) 21:00, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. If anything, Wikipedia is not Urban Dictionary. TheLetterM (talk) 21:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced, non-notable, dictionary entry.--Michig (talk) 21:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and especially per TheLetterM. As an aside, I think we should add Urban Dictionary to WP:NOT or Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Too often do people create articles about nn slang that is not suitable for WP.  Valley 2 city  21:06, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Very good idea. I suggest you post that on wp:VPR DFS454 (talk) 21:11, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete ephemeral neologism. JuJube (talk) 23:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.