Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vatican Radio lawsuit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Jayjg (talk) 02:47, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Vatican Radio lawsuit

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete/Merge

This incident is not notable enough to have it's own article, and at present is a terrible non-neutral piece. What can be salvaged should be merged back into the Vatican Radio article and this article deleted. -Royalguard11 (T) 18:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * delete, the article needs at least to be rewritten. I cannot see any notability.--Atlan da Gonozal (talk) 19:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:47, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This topic as received plenty of notability-demonstrating coverage in books and scholarly papers as well as in the news. Other issues raised above can be dealt with by the normal editing process and discussion on the talk page. I would add that this is a pretty awful title - that's something else for talk page discussion. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:09, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The case has recived a large covarage in the Italian media since 10 years ago. User:Lucifero4


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.