Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaultry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Vaultry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Semi-advertorialized article about a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC and no strong reliable source coverage to carry an article. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform, so every band is not automatically entitled to have an article on here just because they exist -- but nothing here passes any of the notability criteria for bands, and the referencing is entirely to blogs and podcasts and their own social networking profiles, not to real media that would help get them over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 20:09, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 13:38, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Delete. I disagree that the 4 sources cited by  DOOMSDAYER 520 indicate reliable coverage. Sources 1 and 4 are run-of-the-mills quasi-promo paragraphs or two of upcoming appearances/releases (authorship of #4 is credited not to a writer, but rather “victoriamusicscene.”) Source #2 is radio station’s website with a Band of the Month profile (credited to “Webmesiter Bud”) wherein the text is paraphrased content from the “about” section on the band’s website. Source #3 is emphatically not a reliable source; they solicit content per their “contact” section: https://www.unfazedmag.com/contact-1/ Other sources in the article, per the nominator’s comment, similarly fail. ShelbyMarion (talk) 22:19, 26 May 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Undecided - I don't think you can condemn all of the sources in the article as merely podcasts and social networking. The following appear to be reliable and independent of the band:, , , . However those are still fairly obscure and spotty, so I am undecided on whether they qualify as significant in the notability guidelines. But the arguments in Bearcat's nomination may not reflect the situation. On the other hand, if the article is kept it definitely needs to be pared down to verifiable facts. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 23:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Delete: Did google a bit. Couldn't find strong references. Farahpoems (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NMUSIC.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:42, 12 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.