Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vazhayila


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, with thanks to participants for improving the article. Mojo Hand (talk) 23:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Vazhayila

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to be about some place. Normally I don't nominate these articles for deletion (in fact, I'm reluctant to nominate this one), as I believe that populated places are notable, but the article is so poorly written it's better to just start all over. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:28, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 6 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔  17:52, 18 May 2014 (UTC)


 * KEEP The article is actually about a populated place and it isn't so big that it can't be tidied and made better.--Skr15081997 (talk) 09:19, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - as above. This is clearly a real settlement, which is all that needs to be demonstrated. Doubtless there are paper sources. Nom's initial reluctance to nominate was correct! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eustachiusz (talk • contribs) 15:39, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.