Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vbuzzer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  No consensus (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Vbuzzer

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously deleted article. Not a notable company Ernestvoice (talk) 18:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  18:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established. swa  q  18:18, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I notice you discredit WP:GHITS votes often, yet your WP:JNN vote is equally unhelpful. Please expand. SashaNein (talk) 19:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I was referring to it not meeting the notability guidelines (significant coverage in independent reliable sources), not that it was "just not notable", and I have already expanded on this below. swa  q  19:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete Clearly non-notable, verging on spammy. ukexpat (talk) 21:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added some references. --Eastmain (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: One of those is just a passing reference, not convinced that the other two amount to significant coverage. – ukexpat (talk) 19:42, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: Agree. The second and third reference seem to only mention Vbuzzer in a group of other VoIP (though I can't read German very well).  The first reference is very short and is almost more about Skype than Vbuzzer.  swa  q  20:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - Page looks alright, doesn't seem to be selling anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MMuzammils (talk • contribs) 19:31, 23 July, 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep sufficient sources for notability. DGG (talk) 23:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, lifebaka (talk - contribs) 17:51, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep A google search gives over 100,000 hits, that to me passes notability. Doesn't seem to be trying to sell you anything.--  Darth Mike   ( Talk  • Contribs ) 18:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment According to the notability guidelines a topic is presumed notable if it "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". The number of Google search results means little to notability, see: GOOGLEHITS.  swa  q  18:49, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete 10 hits on Google News; all English-language news paper sources (2 of them) are from Globe and Mail, which appears to be its hometown paper. A grand total of 7 hits on an all-English Lexis search, only one of which mentions it anywhere except in passing. This one really does appear to be marginal, and the page has been up for a year and a half. I wouldn't call the coverage by reliable sources significant. RayAYang (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - sufficient sources to establish notability. Note that the Globe and Mail is not a hometown paper.  It is a national newspaper and the second largest daily circulation newspaper in Canada. -- Whpq (talk) 19:52, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.