Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vector (1996 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 22:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Vector (1996 film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A thirteen year old "unreleased" short film. The directors' names link to disambiguation pages, only one of which lists a director (which turns out to be a stub article). All but one of the actors are redlinks; the sole blue link has "unconfirmed" written next to it. ('m not clear on how you can be unconfirmed for a 13 year old film.) Google searches turn up little more than movie database/aggregator sites. Prod declined, pointing out that the film can be watched online. Not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 12:06, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * DELETE Absolutely not notable.Simonm223 (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Christopher Long (director). No reason to lose the more relevant information if it can be merged. (Not sure if Long is notable, but that article can be AfDed on its own merits).ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:03, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - unreleased efforts are generaelly not notable, unless the failure itself is notable. 81.111.114.131 (talk) 03:09, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.