Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vectorwise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) → B  music  ian  03:20, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Vectorwise

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable software. West Eddy (talk) 01:44, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: I mainly found press releases. SL93 (talk) 23:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:03, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Leaning keep. I recalled the name from articles on my primary technology news site, and the database was covered in several articles. It also seems to be mentioned in more recent books on databases (e.g.,, , ) along with other major software, all of which have corresponding articles on Wikipedia. Nageh (talk) 13:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:58, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Clear keep. Major product from a well-known vendor, apparently the leader in its niche, coverage from major IT news sources. JulesH (talk) 20:08, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Note: In 2010, the VectorWise technology was acquired by Ingres Corporation. Ingres Corporation later rebranded to Actian Corporation in 2011. Addition sources are available using search terms with these company names.
 * The topic has received significant coverage in reliable third-party sources:
 * The Register – Ingres' VectorWise rises to answer Microsoft
 * Information Week –  Ingres Unveils VectorWise Database Engine
 * Incisive Financial Publishing –  Ingres launches VectorWise database engine
 * (Short article) The Wall Street Journal – Database-Software Firm Tries 'Action Apps'
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 00:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Significant coverage in several independent reliable sources. --Lambiam 01:11, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.