Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veda Vyasapriya Swami


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 22:41, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Veda Vyasapriya Swami

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable Iskcon swami. Wikid as&#169; 04:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  -- - Spaceman  Spiff  19:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- - Spaceman  Spiff  19:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Couldn't find any coverage of him in independent, reliable sources.--Gaura79 (talk) 11:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable and well sourced article. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:23, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per ism schism.Pectoretalk 19:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete All sources are ISKCON sites except for a passing reference in a news article that does no more than list him as a speaker at an event. Searches away from these sites produce little or nothing. Mangoe (talk) 20:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Mangoe is right, there are no independed or reliable sources to support notability. Wikid as&#169; 20:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Ism and Pectore failed to demonstrate that sources re independent (they are not) and reliable(they are not RS), and provide substantial coverage (again not even that). Wikid as&#169; 06:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.