Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedas (Indian Restaurant)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 20:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Vedas (Indian Restaurant)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This fails WP:GNG and WP:COMPANY. The only reliable and independent source discussing this restaurant in any detail is this. Note that the original article contained more references which I have since removed as they were not WP:RS. As of now there are 3 references in the article of which 2 contain trivial mentions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:48, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:55, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:55, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, fails WP:GNG with one unreferenced non notable award, previously sourced to a blog. Theroadislong (talk) 14:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with nominator and Theroadislong. Fails WP:GNG EllsworthSchmittendorf (talk) 14:06, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Even those references which remain are passing at best. Interesting that gNews search turns up restaurant of same name in California, but nothing about the Shanghai version. Could be a Northern hemisphere bias, but even so, establishments meeting the WP:GNG criteria will still have sufficient WP:RS mentions to qualify. And this does not. Geoff &#124; Who, me? 16:58, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:CORP, should have been speedy deleted. STSC (talk) 02:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: agree with STSC this would have been a valid g11 speedy delete. Brianhe (talk) 22:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I believe this could be speedied under g5; this was created by a banned sockpuppet of the paid editor, . See Sockpuppet_investigations/Boskit190/Archive. Even without that, the article is clearly not worthy for Wikipedia. I'd speedy it myself, but meh. --Yamla (talk) 14:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.