Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedevadandi babu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Although the !vote appears to lean delete, there are two commenters who didn't !vote whose opinions appear to lean toward keep. Delete !voters did not address the issue that the lack of sources issue could be systematic bias toward English sources. From my perspective, this appears to be no consensus. v/r - TP 13:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Vedevadandi babu

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )
 * (the spelling used by IMDb)
 * (the spelling used by IMDb)

No references to show significance or notability of subject. Must be significantly rewritten to encyclopedic. Tow Trucker  talk  00:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 31.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  00:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:09, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: NOW It's encyclopdic. Format is quite often an adressable issue. It does need expansion and sourcing, but perhaps now someone will bother.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Film in a regional Indian language, starring major stars (Mohan Babu and Shilpa Shetty). Unfortunately again there is lack of coverage by English language media, as is the case with many regional language movies in India.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 02:12, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Article is still unreferenced and no consensus is apparent yet.
 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 18:47, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Article is almost empty and may lack context (at least, I couldn't tell what it is). Rotorcowboy $talk contribs$ 18:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * How can you not tell what this is about when it is explained in very simple language in the very first sentence of the article? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, moives are almost always notable. Just because the article isn't well written doesn't mean it's deletable. Specs112   t   c  12:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MOVIE - Does not meet Other Evidence of Notability. It may be possible to meet the standard for 2 full length reviews by nationally known critics if the title was provided in Talugu script or an interlanguage wiki link was provided but without these it is difficult to research and establish notability.--34.254.247.222 (talk) 15:41, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete with no prejudice against recreation if sources can be found. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:39, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Crisco 1492 and the IP. This looks like it should be notable, but I couldn't find any sources either. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 11:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.