Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedic Cosmology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Vedic Cosmology

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unsourced essay. I think the Vedas article covers much of this in a more appropriate way. P. D. Cook Talk to me! 04:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)}}
 * Note - Article creator has been blocked for POV pushing and disruptive editing. P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 05:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * It is a legitimate subject that might deserve a separate article but this is far too confused and incoherent to be a useful starting point. It may well represent a personal interpretation rather than a mainstream view. Either stub it, in the hope that somebody else will work on it, or delete it. I favour stubbing it. If we add it to the appropriate projects there is a good chance somebody will pick it up and make a decent job of it. --DanielRigal (talk) 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Changed my mind. Redirect to Hindu cosmology. It is essentially the same subject. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:13, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Suggesting the deletion of List of numbers in Vedas, sub-article too. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 12:47, 28 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Trojan horse POV push. If there is an authentic article on this topic this needs to blown up to make way for it. Unsalvageable. Carrite (talk) 16:13, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Move to speedy delete as POV-pushing by a blocked editor who has made little to no attempt at contributing to the encyclopedia ever since he got here. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  21:10, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Does G5 apply here? I thought the person had to be blocked at the time of the article's creation (ie created by a sock). P. D. Cook  Talk to me! 21:18, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I meant "by an editor who has been blocked" for continued POV-pushing. G5 only applies to articles created by a sock of a blocked/banned user (since the original user cannot logically create an article underneath a block/ban) and those can be speedy deleted as articles created by the same editor, even with a different account. I'm saying here that the article is what contributed to the block of the editor due to its POV-pushing appearance and should be deleted because of its nature. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  21:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Incoherent personal POV-pushing essay. It's possible that an article on Vedic cosmology might be justified, but this certainly won't do. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per everyone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edward321 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete, then Redirect OR, notability. Hindu cosmology covers some of it. -- Redtigerxyz Talk 12:47, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.