Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedokta controversy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have placed the book citation on the talk page at Talk:Shahaji II for use by editors. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Vedokta controversy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NBOOKS. No actual content in the article anyway, just a copy of the table of contents and basic info. Nsteffel (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now at best as the best my searches found with "Vedokta controversy" was only a few links here and there at Books (one) and browsers (a few it seems). Not currently a better acceptable encyclopedia article, SwisterTwister   talk  06:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete article, use as a reference I was a little puzzled about what the topic of the book actually is, but I found it in Shahaji II, section on Vedokta controversy . The book could be added as a reference there.  DGG ( talk ) 01:36, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Smerge per WP:UNDUE, and as suggested by . Much too little useful information exists for its own article. Bearian (talk) 21:17, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.