Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedran Janjetović (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  05:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Vedran Janjetović
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Vedran has no played a professional football match.Simione001 (talk) 10:29, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Simione001 Simione001 (talk) 07:42, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 01:53, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - although there appears to be some coverage, it is mostly routine sports reporting. Plus, he hasn't played in a fully professional league. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. – Kosm  1  fent  06:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP: GNG, as there are ample reliable sources. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 17:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No he doesn't. These sources are nothing more than routine articles. This is not significant coverage.Simione001 (talk) 23:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Although much of the article is not about him and rather about the circumstances regarding his joining Sydney FC, for the sake of completeness of articles on current Sydney FC players it is worth having the article in existence, especially if it would be created anyway when he played matches. Izumojin (talk) 06:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The fact remains that he fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Since when are articles kept because they make another page look nice?Simione001 (talk) 07:52, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. The coverage is run-of-the-mill transfer news, and saying that the article should be kept "for the sake of completeness of articles on current Sydney FC players" is nonsense - why not create an article on the old lady who makes cups of tea at half-time?! GiantSnowman 08:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. The coverage is routine sports journalism which is insufficient to meet WP:GNG, and he has not played in a fully pro league. As such, the article fails WP:NSPORT as well. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:19, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Query: why is this the "2nd nomination"? - The Bushranger One ping only 23:20, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:GNG as WP:ROUTINE, fails WP:NFOOTY as WP:TOOSOON. - The Bushranger One ping only 23:20, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.