Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veer Gidwaney


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. KTC (talk) 00:23, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Veer Gidwaney

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In order to have an article here the person must have been the subject of non-trivial by multiple, independent third party reliable sources. At best this person was 1/30th of the subject of one such source (allegedly being part of a 30 people under 30 piece by Maclean's). DreamGuy (talk) 02:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 22:23, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete -- nothing notable that I can see. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. If we had an article on Control-F1 then it could have been merged there, but we don't, and I don't think there is enough independent coverage to support an article on the company. Not enough independent coverage to convince me that this is suitable for an encyclopedia. --Michig (talk) 10:56, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.