Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veera M

Veera M

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:TOOSOON and other arguments. Guy (Help!) 22:44, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Well the prod was removed (well it was a BLP prod) this actor falls under too soon Wgolf (talk) 00:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 07:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dai Pritchard (talk) 07:30, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep and improve - lead roles in Mosakutty and a new film; good coverage online in English in WP:RS including two interviews in national media (I haven't searched for coverage in Tamil yet); the Times of India ref says the new film in production is notable because he's in it. Notable per WP:NACTOR. Dai Pritchard (talk) 08:07, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete his career in acting started less than 2 years ago, He's young and his notability could easily increase with his career. but where his notability is at now I don't see it meeting it when I do a google search for 3rd parties. Bryce Carmony (talk) 13:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:TOOSOON, a single significant role in a notable film and the related coverage is not enough for a claim of notability. As usual, the article was created by a SPA editor with the only goal of promoting the relevant film. Cavarrone 11:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 10:44, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete The Article is simply a stub and clearly does not qualify BLP at all. Dormantos (talk) 12:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This newly registered account has left the very similar deletion rationales (almost every one a "strong delete") on dozens of AfDs in rapid fashion. Likely he did not read any of the articles (one he said fails "BLP" was a company, for example). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I notice that you've written on your user page, "I am confused why BLP is the only option to judge notability." In fact, that's not a standard on which to judge notability at all. The standard for notability in biographies is WP:BIO. I also see that after creating an account today, you've commented in a large number of AFD biography discussions. Please familiarise yourself with WP:AFD and WP:BIO, before requesting deletion in a biographical AFD. Thank you. Dai Pritchard (talk) 12:48, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This user has been blocked. --MelanieN (talk) 01:43, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I just saw that comment and was going "really? Its far from the shortest article and if we really didn't think it qualify it be csd" Wgolf (talk) 01:49, 10 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:TOOSOON and the 1-hit wonder one too. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:05, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.