Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veera Parampare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Akirn (talk) previously User:Icewedge 20:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Veera Parampare

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

page does not show notability for film. if the user can provide notable references, possibly something on an indian movie chart or something, then i think it'd be set. Qö₮$@37 (talk) 18:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC) Qö₮$@37 (talk) 18:53, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per, , , , and . Joe Chill (talk) 23:15, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Bollywood isn't exactly my area of expertise, but it appears to be a significant film with two major stars which is well into shooting already. Notable enough as far as I can tell. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  00:05, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notable Kannada film as the references above show. Note to nom - There is no single "India Movie" chart. There are a lot of regional language film industries of which Bollywood is the biggest and best known to the outside world. Besides bollywood there are Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, Malayalam, Bengali, Marathi and Bhojpuri film industries.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand stub per sources found and offered by User:Joe Chill and additionally available sources. That an article is poorly written is a reason to fix it if possible... not delete it. And toward the nominator's bringing the article to AFD just 3 minutes after it was created... AFD is not for cleanup.  A little communication with the author first would have far better served the project.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.