Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veerbhumi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn and article redirected. Yes, I !voted, but the redirect has already been performed. This is just a procedural close of the discussion. Star  Mississippi  14:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Veerbhumi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reason: The article cites NO SOURCE at all. Reading Beans Talk to the Beans 21:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Reading Beans Talk to the Beans 21:05, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:12, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - probably notable. I think the correct title would be "Veer Bhumi" as listed at Raj Ghat and associated memorials. Based on a quick Google and Google books review it appears the topic would meet GNG, but as the current article is unreferenced completely it would be better to redirect, which has as much information as this sub-stub.   78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 21:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Question not sure if you had an issue in the nomination template. There's no rationale present.  Star   Mississippi  02:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It was a mistake. My mistake. Reading Beans Talk to the Beans 04:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks Reading Beans. Redirect to Raj_Ghat_and_associated_memorials where it's mentioned. It has no traffic as it was just created, but reasonable search term and Veer bhumi already redirects there. Star   Mississippi  16:10, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Can I remove the tag now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reading Beans (talk • contribs) 16:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Which tag? Skarmory   (talk •   contribs)  16:50, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are OK with a redirect, yes you can withdraw this nomination as even @78.26 who views it as notable thinks a redirect is the better solution currently. Star   Mississippi  19:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, agreed.  78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 20:09, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * REDIRECTED. Reading Beans Talk to the Beans 06:23, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Star Mississippi. Skarmory   (talk •   contribs)  16:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.