Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veg*n


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Should be discussed at RFD. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  17:11, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Veg*n

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nothing Encylopedia like, no text, no meaning aidar24 (talk) 07:34, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete for lack of content. I have tagged the article as such. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 08:15, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete No content whatsoever. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 21:45, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or relist at WP:RFD. This is a soft redirect and by that guideline should not be assessed as an article, though perhaps its usefulness as a redirect (which may be limited, since it does not meet the criteria at Template:Wi) should be examined at Redirects for discussion. See the thread here, a conversation between the admin who did speedily delete it and the admin who requested its restoration. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:00, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Soft redirects are exempt from A3, and the wi tag is a useful way of discouraging people from creating bad articles at the title. Stifle (talk) 10:54, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.