Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vega Conflict


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW keep. Article has been shown to pass WP:GNG, despite being a stub in its current form. (non-admin closure) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 18:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Vega Conflict

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable video game. Celestina007 (talk) 13:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 13:12, 18 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment Not my area, but I found this pretty quickly - it's a good length, and looks like it was written by a staff writer - that would potentially contribute to notability, there might be more out there. Girth Summit  (blether)  16:35, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * That certainly isn't a reliable site to use, looks like a fan blog site without a staff attached at all. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:58, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Computer games are not my area, so I'll defer to others' opinions on this, but looking a bit more closely, their 'about us' lists their editorial team, and their 'careers' page suggests that they employ freelance writers for their content - it doesn't have the usual 'submit a review' or 'get published' area that I can see anywhere. Girth Summit  (blether)  17:10, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It doesn't matter now with 4 reliable sources I have found in my searches per my comment below. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:22, 18 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep Actually, this should have been moved to draft to be incubated instead of this, but because WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP, I am leaning this way. There is several significant coverage in reliable sources, such as Gamezebo, Engadget , Touch Arcade and AdWeek . Not strongly notable, but enough to pass the requirement per WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:21, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keeep per Jovanmilic97 - the article needs work, and some of these sources should be added to demonstrate notability, but I think it's a pass on GNG. Girth Summit  (blether)  17:58, 18 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.