Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vega Monsters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  06:40, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Vega Monsters

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Like Saucer Beasts, this does not appear to have been the subject of reliable third-party coverage, the article itself is unreferenced and appears to be simply a random collection of in-universe information.  Kraftlos  (Talk | Contrib) 12:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- Kraftlos  (Talk | Contrib) 12:28, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep This information was gathered in the actual show itself and translated into English, no different than the Mechanical Beasts and Warrior Beasts from Mazinger Z and Great Mazinger, respectively. The only difference is that someone collected this information now as opposed to back then. It should be also noted that unlike the Mechanical Beasts and Warrior Beasts articles this one has external links. It should be also noted that I have found a reliable source with the exact names and referenced it by following the guidelines set.--Yapool Seijin (talk) 13:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia isn't a random collection of information. Whether or not other articles exist that might be equally or less notable is irrelevant; what is relevant is whether or not this subject has been covered by reliable independent sources per Wikipedia's inclusion guidelines.  -- Kraftlos  (Talk | Contrib) 06:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I did manage to find a reliable source that does cover this subject, the reference that was recently added does have the all of the names in chronological order. Yapool Seijin (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * An Italian fansite is not a reliable source. —Farix (t &#124; c) 00:01, 24 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete These are literally monsters of the week and are incidental to the storyline. —Farix (t &#124; c) 20:30, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete- Excessive fan trivia and plot summary that does not appear to be covered in reliable secondary sources. Reyk  YO!  08:06, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per others. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:40, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete same as above... could not find a good source..  Traxs 7   (Talk) 05:24, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.