Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegansexuals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete a1 empty, see WP:NEO. NawlinWiki 04:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Vegansexuals

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Violation of WP:NEO. This term is not in wide currency, and has only recently been coined. In fact, the article cited was written today. MagneticFlux 23:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ew. wikipediatrix 23:41, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - though I should point out I found another source at, so it may at least satisfy WP:V to some extent. However, it doesn't appear to be in wide usage, so I can't see it becoming anything more than a dictionary definition. ~Matticus TC 23:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Agree with Matticus. I did a news search:  .  This is a very new term, coined in one place and, if anywhere, it would belong in Wiktionary. Also WP:NOT  Douglasmtaylor   T / C  00:08, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Recreation of deleted material - I have just found out that the article vegansexual has already been deleted two times today. --MagneticFlux 00:10, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * In that case, speedy and salt. CaveatLectorTalk 00:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly violates WP:NEO--Fahrenheit451 00:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.