Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vegetarianism and veganism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 01:46, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Vegetarianism and veganism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This is an un-sourced personal essay. There are articles at vegetarianism and veganism which point clearly to one another. - Sinneed  16:10, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. This is a well-written essay, but it isn't what Wikipedia is for. Erpert (let's talk about it) 16:27, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per above - Wikipedia is not the place for essays. - EdoDodo  talk 16:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to vegetarianism as the overarching term. Lady  of  Shalott  17:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Anotehr essay on a subject we already cover.Slatersteven (talk) 21:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I will quote a part of what I wrote back in the Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stevertigo/Obama and accusations of National Socialism discussion; "The "article" content was entirely a product of the author's personal opinion; no sources, no references, not a shred of much of anything to back it up. The Wikipedia is not the place for original research or self-published writings". That this user continues to use the Wikipedia as a venue for personal opinion is a bit troubling. Tarc (talk) 01:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per WP:SYNTHESIS. This is: 1)an essay, 2)a synthesis, &/or 3)a detractor from the main articles. All of which are against WP policy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by T3h 1337 b0y (talk • contribs) 02:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - unsourced essay that serves the redundant purpose of disambiguating two articles that already disambiguate each other. Any otherwise non-redundant ideas explored in this essay need to be reliably sourced before recreation or merging into Vegetarianism and Veganism. -kotra (talk) 19:48, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete If any content is worth preserving it can be merged to any of the first three links presented in the article: Vegetarianism, Veganism, or Ethics of vegetarianism. r ʨ anaɢ (talk) 04:28, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.