Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veilig Rijen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Feel free to re-create it as a redirect to an appropriate target. &mdash;SW&mdash; confer 21:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Veilig Rijen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I couldn't find any indication that the film was notable (or that much more information was available than was already listed in the article.) I propose this article to be deleted for lack of notability. Mgm|(talk) 07:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete A very small article on a short film without any verifiable third party sources and references. Does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Appears non-notable as there has actually been no article expansion and information edit history since it was created 10 months ago. Plus no article of this name exists on any other Wikipedia including the Dutch Wikipedia where it actually should have been made if this short film was notable. TheGeneralUser (talk) 08:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Only found this on the site of the Netherlands Film Festival. Doesn't seem to be a notable film to me, can't find any other sources. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 17:25, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Since it lacks sourcing to be a separate article, why not redirect Wikipedia readers to the one place where it might be at least mentioned... the article on the filmmaker?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment Hello MichaelQSchmidt, while i agree with your point, there isn't anything beneficial in redirecting or merging the article to Rob Das. This article does not contain any inside information other than just saying that it is a short film and starring people which don't have a page except for Ramsey Nasr whose filmograhy doesn't even mention Veilig Rijen. TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:30, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Not suggesting a merge... but redirects are cheap and sending readers to Rob Das is the one place where it can be listed as part of his filmography. And such a redirect might actually encourage Dutch-reading Wikipedians to review available sources on the filmmaker and perhaps expand the redirect target. Wkipeidia's coverage of non-English films and filmmakers is always worth expanding... and that would be for the good.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:54, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed, but I can't find any Dutch reliable sources. If this were an American short film no-one would think twice about deleting it. SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 01:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I am not at all opposed to a deletion. You did find and offer a source showing it has screened, so thank you. But as it failed to receive any coverage, I agree it does not merit a separate article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect per my comments above. When a topic lacks the sourcable notability to merit a separate article, it serves our readers to at the least send them to the one place where even a non-notable film might be listed within the director's filmography.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:23, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.