Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veljo Pecan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 17:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Veljo Pecan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, not notable, probably fictional person. Jingiby (talk) 12:24, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Shows no proof of notability and is unsourced.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:09, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Macedonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 10 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - Not a fictional person. . - The Bushranger One ping only 02:26, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - Found the same reference and it troubles me a bit. The book noted above is published by Princeton University Press.  The mention in the book states "In the Ilinden Uprising in KruSovo," he wrote, "only one of the Mijaci took part — Veljo Pecan." as if it is obvious to the reader who this person would be.  Yet I cannot find anything else os substance.  Is there perhaps an alternate transliteration of the name that we are missing?. -- Whpq (talk) 17:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I tried to find something in Bulgarian or Macedonian, but I didn't. Jingiby (talk) 19:02, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:52, 17 January 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete - I've looked some more, and despite my concern noted above, ultimately, we need to have reliable sourcing which appears to be completely absent at this point. I will happily change my !vote if we can find sourcing to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.