Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vellian Crowler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Yu-Gi-Oh! GX characters. No non-primary sourcing or real-world notability is apparent Black Kite 22:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Vellian Crowler

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete This is non-notable. It's really nothing more than a collection of TV trivia which makes it unencyclopedic.George Pelltier (talk) 06:05, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment It should notified that this Afd was not listed properly by the nominator hence a day was lost this way. Further more it should be also know that another Afd by the same nominator had the same issue corrected Articles_for_deletion/Leorio by another user and the nominator did not make any effort to correct issue with this Afd. That say a lot on how much this editor cared to have those Afds done properly --KrebMarkt 21:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge a concise character description and voice actor information to List of Yu-Gi-Oh! GX characters. As the article currently stands, there is no non-trivial coverage of the character by reliable third-party sources. Without reliable third-party sources, we can't have an article on the subject. Role in the plot does not play a factor in determining if the character should be included as a stand-alone article. --Farix (Talk) 23:25, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article is entirely plot summary and in-universe info without real-world information. Notability has not been established via reliable secondary sources. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge I believe there was a prior AfD that ruled that this and other GX character articles would be merged, but it never happened. JuJube (talk) 06:00, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep/Merge Nominator doesn't seem to have a clue what he's doing. Also, let it be noted that the copy-pasted rage essay he has on his user page is applying to him now more than anyone else. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 17:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Enough information to warrant its own page. Merging would mean deleting at least 90% of that to make it fit on a character page, and I'm certainly against that.   D r e a m Focus  12:13, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.