Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velmarie Berlingeri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 20:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Velmarie Berlingeri

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I was going to nom for CSDA7 but then saw it had been prod, and deleted before, only to be created again. Person is clearly not notable, and no claim of notability is made. She is nominated (although will go into office today) to be the administrator of the executive mansion, a minor administrative post with little visibility or power.

Oddly enough, incoming Governor Luis Fortuño's article has a number of cabinet nominations, and besides those notable for other things, she, a minor official, has a page, over even the Waterworks President who is being retained from the previous administration.

Additionally, page creator seems to concentrate only on this article, so there is concern about COI, and possible vanity issues. In particular the peacock terms and un-sourced quotes at the end are worrying.

This article should be speedy deleted and protected from recreation, but since previous admins who deleted didn't I am raising this process to formalize a discussion. It is obvious SD failed here. Do I hear snowball? Cerejota (talk) 08:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete-- Zero hits in Google news. I agree with nomination, this administrative post is not visible in Puerto Rico news sources. --Jmundo (talk) 22:16, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:06, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The article is clearly not notable upon verification.--Ped Admi (talk) 01:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, (G4 maybe?) I don't know what the deleted version was like, but this one is still a pretty obvious delete. Tavix (talk) 01:16, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note The article appears to have been speedy deleted twice (CSD A7) and then restored by one of the deleting admins.. CSD G4 is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion here because the article was not previously deleted by way of a deletion discussion. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:03, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  19:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.