Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velocity Living


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete, after disregarding !votes form new users. Deathphoenix ʕ 20:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Velocity Living
Delete. It's an ordinary block of flats that hasn't been completed yet. [Check Google hits] shows 237 results (76 "unique") which are either notices about the construction or they just contain the phrase "velocity living" for whatever reason. Contested prod. ... disco spinster   talk  15:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, so not worthy. jd || talk || 15:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Do Not Delete This is an important development in the city of sheffield. and on completion of the rest of the project/phase will be one of the largest residential complexes in the city. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.28.186 (talk • contribs)
 * Do Not Delete This is a major regeneration for the city of Sheffield, utilising a previously chronically under-used site. This is a great design, worthy of inclusion, and will be one of the largest residential and office complexes in the city and indeed Yorkshire with the completion of phase 2 and 3, already underconstruction.  I can only add it is a small article, intended for expansion at a later date, and I will include details such as height, floors, office space, companies using, capacity, price etc, as I have time and these details emerge  L.J.Skinner, talk to me 12:37, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Thryduulf 23:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Following the new information, the page now reads more like an estate agents brochure and still doesnt justify to me why it needs an article more than any other new block of flats in a redevelopment area of any city in the world. My reccomendation to delete remains the same. Thryduulf 11:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - average apartment/office complex. Laalaaa 22:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Also, suggest moving to "Velocity Space" or "Velocity Development", but I can't be sure I can do it and keep it linked to AfD without messing it up! L.J.Skinner, talk to me 11:17, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Page edited to include further information. I feel that this is a vast improvement on the previous, frankly lacking, article, and now is a lot more useful and noteworthy.
 * Comment: I've got no opinion on the title should the article be kept, but moving an article is best not done during an AfD debate. Even non-controversial moves normally wait until the discussion is closed, as it can get quite complicated, even for experienced users, to ensure all the links continue to go to the right place. Thryduulf 11:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * reply: That was my assumption, and hence I haven't moved it. L.J.Skinner, talk to me 11:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.