Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velocity Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep.  Grue  12:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Velocity Magazine
Another editor, User:Cholmes75 added a prod tag to this article. I think that Velocity Magazine 'is notable, but I thought I should bring it here since it would probably end up here in any event. --TruthbringerToronto 20:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. --TruthbringerToronto 20:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak, weak keep. This magazine isn't very old, and and its notability is only marginal at best. --Coredesat talk 21:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I find only 22 relevant Google hits. Just being a local special intgerest magazine is not notable, IMO.  Eluchil404 20:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Dounds at least mildly notable. --TruthbringerToronto 21:18, 2 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.