Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velsharoon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Forgotten Realms deities. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Velsharoon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While it appears in a handful of works within the D&D fiction, most of these appear to be passing mentions. Certainly this is not one of the core characters in the fiction. The existing coverage at [] should suffice.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  03:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:35, 28 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Forgotten Realms deities (existing coverage there is sufficient). No significant coverage from reliable, independent secondary sources, topic fails to establish notability and thus doesn't deserve a stand-alone article per WP:GNG.Folken de Fanel (talk) 18:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge appropriate content to List of Forgotten Realms deities Web Warlock (talk) 12:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into List of Forgotten Realms deities. BOZ (talk) 14:35, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
 * no third party sources covering the subject, thus fails WP:N. delete or merge if there is any appropriate content for an appropriate target article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  04:07, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of Forgotten Realms deities unless and until significant coverage comes up for this relatively minor deity. —Torchiest talkedits 04:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep no evidence of any prior editorial discussion re: merging, sourcing, etc. is evident on the talk page, making this nomination premature. Jclemens (talk) 06:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.