Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Veluna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Flanaess. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 05:18, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Veluna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This topic fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 19:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 19:59, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Flanaess. No sign of general notability, no sources other than D&D reference materials. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 22:53, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M. Jclemens (talk) 06:45, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect -- there's nothing to merge as the article does not include 3rd party citations. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:32, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete this is one of many fictional subdivisions of fictional settings for D&D. It is trivial. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:26, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge with Flanaess. This is just a more specific page on a more broad topic that is notable, so I don't see why I should favor deletion over merging.  Power~enwiki's suggestion for a redirect is a bit unusual, considering the fact that there is no information on Veluna itself on Flanaess. Borderlandor (talk) 05:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 23:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete or, if necessary, merge, as above. Josh Milburn (talk) 04:41, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Flanaess per K.e.coffman. Zero citations = WP:V/CITE Fail = Nothing to merge. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:55, 29 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.